Per la Rice, una rischiosa immersione nella tempesta mediorientale

Usa, pol. estera, MO          Nyt        05-11-16

Per la Rice, una rischiosa immersione nella tempesta mediorientale

Steven R. Weisman

Il più alto profilo assunto dagli USA rischia di costringere gli Usa ad esercitare una maggiore pressione su Israele, pressione possibile solo se le relazioni israele-palestinesi saranno pacifiche, cosa che è al di fuori del contro americano.

Allarme crescente per l’impasse su Gaza, timore di maggiore instabilità e frustrazione che potrebbe portare alla mancata rielezione in gennaio del presidente palestinese Mahmoud Abbas.

Gli alleati arabi ed europei hanno fatto pressione per un maggiore impegno americano, si è parlato di pericolo di perdita della credibilità per Bush e Rice, e di ultima possibilità per molto tempo. Pressioni anche dall’inviato per il MO del Quartetto, Stati Uniti, Russia, UE e ONU, James D. Wolfensohn.

La Rice è stata criticata per aver delegato i negoziati sul Nord Corea a un consorzio di partner guidati dalla Cina e lasciato i negoziati con l’Iran a GB, Francia e Germania.

Nyt          05-11-16

For Rice, a Risky Dive Into the Mideast Storm
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

PUSAN, South Korea, Wednesday, Nov. 16 – Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spent all day and night successfully brokering an accord on Tuesday on security controls at a Gaza border crossing, suddenly elevating the Bush administration’s involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a new level.

Until now President Bush and Secretary Rice have avoided taking risks in the conflict, confining their diplomacy to consultations, exhortations, drive-by visits to the region and documents like the "road map" to a Palestinian state, which calls for several steps by Palestinians and Israelis, few of which have occurred.

What changed this week, State Department officials said, was mounting alarm at the bitter impasse over the Gaza Strip after the Israeli withdrawal last summer and fear of more instability and frustration that could lead to a rebuke of the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, in parliamentary elections in January.

That sense of urgency, driven by warnings from Washington’s Arab and European allies as well as from American envoys, prompted Ms. Rice’s unusual personal participation in the negotiations in Jerusalem. That resulted in the accord announced early Tuesday morning giving Palestinians control over a Gaza crossing, with monitors from the European Union.

The Arab and European allies pressed for more American efforts to untangle the issues paralyzing the peace negotiations. Diplomats from allied countries have said the credibility of Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice is at risk, and they have besieged Ms. Rice to seize the opportunity or lose what they regard as the last chance of making peace for years to come.

"A lot of diplomacy is about when things are ripe for movement," a senior State Department official said. "There was the sense that now was the time to really capitalize on the situation." The official insisted on anonymity under the department’s ground rules for briefings.

Ms. Rice arrived in Pusan on Wednesday morning to attend the Asia-Pacific economic conference.

Another form of pressure came from James D. Wolfensohn, the Middle East envoy of the so-called quartet consisting of the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations. Mr. Wolfensohn had begun blaming a lack of American involvement for the impasse behind the scenes.

"If you are an envoy of the quartet you have a certain amount of possibilities in negotiations," Mr. Wolfensohn, a former president of the World Bank, said in Jerusalem on Tuesday. "If you are the secretary of state of the United States, I would have to say, there is a little more clout associated with it. And to push it over the edge one needs not envoys, but secretaries of state."

The challenge for Ms. Rice now is to keep the process going, since the Gaza agreement will be difficult to carry out and the next phase of efforts to ease tensions promises to stir resentment on both sides.

Israelis and Palestinians are now likely to demand more American involvement on a range of issues, from the Palestinians’ call for Israel to ease its presence in the West Bank to the Israeli demand for a crackdown on Hamas and other militant groups. Ms. Rice took office early this year amid criticism that the Bush administration had relied largely on force in its first term. "The time for diplomacy is now," she said then.

But she has effectively outsourced the negotiations on North Korea to a consortium of partners led by China and left dealings with Iran to a team led by Britain, France and Germany. On the Middle East now, the United States is front and center.

Probably the most difficult aspect of Washington’s enhanced role is that it could lead to more American pressure on Israel. This week Ms. Rice leaned heavily on Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his aides to ease Israeli controls over the people and goods going in and out of the Gaza Strip. How much pressure she can exert on other matters depends on a peaceful Israeli-Palestinian situation, something that is outside American control.

If suicide or rocket attacks resume, with Gaza as a base, American pressure on Israel to freeze the expansion of its settlements and the building of its security barrier, or to lift checkpoints and roadblocks in the West Bank, will probably be out of the question.

At the same time that Ms. Rice was negotiating the accord, former President Bill Clinton was in Jerusalem for memorials to Yitzhak Rabin, the prime minister who was assassinated 10 years ago. Mr. Clinton got rapturous receptions. But Mr. Bush has deliberately avoided his example in most cases, particularly his personal involvement in the Middle East.

Ms. Rice had also avoided personal involvement, and last February she deliberately left the region to avoid appearing at a summit meeting of Arab, Palestinian and Israeli leaders in Sharm el Sheik, Egypt, to complete the Gaza withdrawal plan.

But when she arrived in Jerusalem on Sunday, aides said she was determined that this trip was going to be different, in part because of Mr. Wolfensohn’s dire warnings about the deteriorating situation.

"We’re going to get this done while I’m here," Ms. Rice told Mr. Sharon and Mr. Abbas in separate meetings, according to State Department officials. The two leaders’ reaction, the
officials said, was skepticism, and there were suggestions that she narrow the scope of what she wanted to accomplish in one day of talks.

Some issues have indeed been put off – not simply the details of carrying out the agreement but also plans for an airport for the Palestinians. Also deferred are the issues of Israel’s presence in the West Bank and actions that the Americans wanted Mr. Abbas to undertake to disarm militant groups. Rebuffing American requests, he has said he cannot confront those armed groups until after the elections in January.

American officials vow to hold Mr. Abbas to his promise, saying he should realize how much his standing in Washington will be on the line.

On Tuesday, Ms. Rice, who got two hours of sleep Monday night, was getting some rest. "We have a long road ahead, a long road ahead," Ms. Rice said earlier in the day. "I have to say as a football fan, sometimes the last yard is the hardest, and I think we experienced that today."

Copyright 2005 The New York Times

Leave a Reply